An essay on the Belgian
identity
Situation of the country
The "peaceful anarchism" of
Brussels architecture may well be the
feature that best characterizes
Belgium as a whole. During its history of
over 2000 years, the region has almost
continuously been occupied by foreign powers:
from the Romans to the Spanish, the Austrians,
the French, the Dutch and the Germans. This has
made the Belgians critical of any form of
authority, and laws, rules and regulations are
not taken very seriously (tax evasion is one of
the national sports). This individualistic,
anti-authoritarian attitude is perhaps best
exemplified by the famous literary figure of
Thyl Uilenspiegel, who mocked the Spanish
authorities during the 16th century occupation.
The governing of the country is very much
complicated by the particular structure with
three
language communities (
Flanders
in the North,
Wallonia
in the South, and a tiny
German
speaking region in the East), and the
multilingual, multicultural and multinational
status of Brussels. The language in Wallonia is
French (although there still exists a not
officially recognized "Walloon
language"). The language in Flanders is
Flemish, which is officially the same language
as the Dutch which is spoken in Holland. In
practice, the differences between Flemish and
Dutch (mostly pronunciation, also vocabulary and
expressions) are comparable to the differences
between British and American English, and are
just big enough so that Dutch TV sometimes add
subtitles to Flemish spoken movies. Although
Brussels is surrounded by Flemish territory, the
majority there speaks French. Flanders comprises
about 55% of the 10 million of Belgian
inhabitants, Brussels 10 % and Wallonia the
remaining 35%.
There have been a lot of political conflicts
between the two main linguistic communities, but
the language problem, which is the issue that
has received most publicity outside Belgium, is
(at least in my view) much less important than
it seems. Since the federalization of the state
the linguistic conflicts seem to have very much
diminished, now that politicians are no longer
capable to blame difficulties on the "other
side". There have never been any real conflicts
between Belgian (Walloon and Flemish) people, as
opposed to conflicts between Belgian
politicians. The best illustration of that is
that even during the most heated episodes, no
one has ever been killed or seriously injured in
clashes connected with the linguistic conflict.
It suffices to consider similar situations in
other countries where conflicts exist between
cultural or linguistic communities (e.g.
Yugoslavia, Canada, Northern Ireland) to
conclude that such peacefulness is not the
common rule.
Belgium has, since the Middle Ages, always
been one of the richest and most developed
regions in the world. Just look at the historic
churches, town halls, and pieces of art, in
cities such as Brussels, Ghent, Bruges, and
Antwerp to get an idea of the wealth during the
mediaeval and Renaissance periods, when only the
North of Italy could rival its splendour and
artistic development. During its second golden
age, the half century before World War I,
Belgium was in absolute terms the fourth
economic power in the world. If you take into
account that the other industrial powers had a 5
to 10 times larger population, the achievement
is impressive. This wealth was not due to
natural resources, which are practically absent,
but to industrial production and trade, which is
facilitated by Belgium's central position in
Western Europe, and the presence of many land
and waterways.
Although it is fashionable in some quarters
to view Belgium as an "artificial state", put
together by the European powers after Napoleon's
defeat, history shows that the region which is
now called Belgium has been almost continuously
under a single rule since at least the 16th
century, when it got separated from Holland
during the reformation. Before that period (and
for a few years after the defeat of Napoleon),
Belgium and the Netherlands were united, forming
the "Low Countries", a remainder of the third,
central part of the Frankish empire,
Lotharingia, that formed a corridor between
France and Germany. There has historically never
been a clear split between the Walloon and
Flemish provinces. Insofar that there was a
division in counties and duchies (Flanders,
Brabant, Liège/Limburg, ...), the divide was
East-West rather than North-South as it is now.
(this is clearly seen on a set of
historical
maps of the wider German region). The
"Flemish" painters and polyphonists who were
famous throughout Europe in the Middle Ages and
Renaissance often were of Walloon origin (for
example the painter Rogier Van der Weyden/Rogier
de la Pasture and the composer Josquin des
Prés).
The Belgian identity
The many contacts with various cultures made
Belgians tolerant and flexible. On the other
hand, the many foreign rules, the skepticism
towards government and authority, the internal
linguistic split, and the fact that the country
was too small to engage in internationally
ambitious enterprises (Belgium's only colony,
the present Congo, was in fact donated by its
king Leopold II, who had privately colonized
it), have led to a relative lack of national
pride and self-confidence. Belgium may well be
one of the least nationalistic countries in the
world. On the positive side this leads to
modesty, to openness to external influences and
to unwillingness to engage in offensive actions,
or even to engage in war at all unless it is
purely defensive. On the negative side, it means
that opportunities are missed because one does
not dare to take an initiative, on the
assumption that the country is not big or
powerful enough to start an ambitious project,
or to do something better than the others.
Belgians may be one of the few nationals who
will criticize their country, rather than make
publicity for it, among people from other
countries.
This self-criticism leads often to distorted
pictures of the country abroad. Since Belgium is
not sufficiently important for most foreign
media to send journalists there on a long term
basis, and since the Belgian reality is anyway
very complex and counter-intuitive for people
living in different types of culture, the media
tend to rely on reports by Belgians for their
news about the country. Since these
"self-reports" tend to focus on everything that
goes wrong, from which the media, as they always
do, select the most spectacular aspects, the
image you get of Belgium in foreign newspapers
is often one of a country on the brink of social
and economic collapse. This image is held up in
particular by those who dislike the process of
European integration, and who see Belgium, home
of the European "government" (the Commission),
as an exemplar of everything that is wrong with
the European Union.
This image is completely off the mark,
though. Belgium is not only one of the richest
countries in the world, but as shown by
statistics from the World Bank, averaged over a
10 year period (1985-95) its economy has been
growing faster than any of the other rich
countries, with the exception of those in East
Asia. While the Asian economies have collapsed
in the meantime, the Belgian economy continues
to grow at a healthy rate. Also the different
political and social problems are easily put
into perspective: whatever the disagreements on
the political level, there has not been any
violence in the streets. No one has died because
of political conflicts. Even the few large
protest demonstrations that Belgium has known
(e.g. against nuclear missiles, or for reform of
the justice system) were remarkably dignified
and peaceful. There have been no large, national
strikes for the past 20 years or so, and the
Belgian political system is quite stable, with
only small changes now and then in the ruling
coalition.
The only "danger" for the foreseeable future
is that the two language communities would grow
further apart, becoming largely autonomous, so
that the Belgian state would only remain as a
minor administrative level between the regional
level and the European Union level. The
probability that Flanders and Wallonia would
separate completely (like in the "velvet
divorce" between Czechia and Slovakia), making
Belgium disappear, is quite small, though. The
reason is that none of the two communities is
prepared to give up Brussels, which because of
its multilingual status cannot be cut up into a
Flemish and Walloon part.
The Belgian's lack of pride also leads to the
lack of a clear image for the country abroad.
Other comparable small countries have easily
recognizable images: for example, Switzerland is
immediately associated with banking, clocks and
mountains, Holland with tulips, cheese and
wind-mills. For Belgium, on the other hand, no
clear associations spring to mind. This is due
partly to the lack of image-building and
marketing, partly to the fact that the Belgian
culture and landscape is extremely varied, and
cannot be summarized in a few symbols.
To my opinion, it is not due to the lack of a
national identity, though. That national
character is rather subtle, and not easy to
formulate in a few words. Though Flemish and
Walloon cultures differ in several respects (as
could be expected, the Flemish are closer to the
more disciplined, Northern European, Germanic
culture, and the Walloon to the more
life-enjoying, Mediterranean, Latin culture),
they have more things in common than most are
willing to admit. A clear indication is that,
although on the basis of language Wallonia seems
to fit in with the neighbouring France and
Flanders with the neighbouring Holland, very few
in either Flanders or Wallonia have ever dared
to suggest that their region should leave
Belgium and join the more powerful neighbour
state. Not even the German-speaking part, which
was annexed after the first world war, is
willing to rejoin the wealthy unified Germany.
What all Belgians have in common is a love
for the "good life", which they find in their
excellent food and drink, comfortable housing,
reliable medical and social services, highly
developed traffic and communications
infrastructure. Belgians are not the type
wanting to impress other people with their
achievements, or to convince others of their
righteousness. They tend to be rather reserved
or introverted in their first contacts with
other people, but are sincerely warm and
friendly once you get to know them better. They
are happy when they can enjoy a safe and
comfortable life, together with their family and
friends, and they put a high value on privacy.
They have a clear aversion towards moralizing,
towards telling other people how they should or
should not behave (an attitude for which they
critize their neighbours in Holland), and they
take "live and and let live" as the basis for
their philosophy. R. Hill, in a book on
different European characters, describes the
Belgians as "open-minded opportunists", noting
their pragmatical attitude.
An anecdote illustrating this attitude was
reported by a British officer commanding Belgian
troops during the first world war. Whereas
soldiers normally are supposed to follow orders
without questioning, the Belgians would first
ask why they were supposed to do something
particular. Only after they got an acceptable
reason they would execute the order. This stands
in contrast to the often absurd manoeuvres
undertaken by British, French and German troops,
where thousands of lives were sacrificed in
order to gain a few meters of terrain. This
attitude may explain why the losses in human
lives were much smaller among the Belgians than
among other nations, even though a large part of
the battles took place on Belgian territory
("Flanders' fields").
Another character trait noted by Hill is a
"democratic" attitude, in the sense that
Belgians make very little distinction between
classes or social strata. It is not because you
are a professor, a noble man or a rich banker
that you will be treated with special respect or
privileges. Everybody has the right to be taken
serious, and to get a good education and a
decent way of living. On the economic plane,
this egalitarian philosophy is illustrated by
the fact that Belgium has the lowest
percentage of poor people in the world.
Quality of life
The skepticism towards government, the lack of
pride about one's own achievements, and the
general "anarchistic" way of doing things may
create the false impression that life in Belgium
is not well-organized. Though Belgians dislike
discipline imposed upon them by superiors,
bureaucracy, ideology or religion, they
compensate by hard work and self-discipline. In
spite of regular changes of government, Belgians
trains do run on time, and the administrative
services do help people generally in a fast and
effective way.
Belgian workers are the most productive in
the world. According to German statistics
(1992), industrial productivity (amount of goods
produced per worker) in Belgium is some 20 %
higher than in the next most productive country,
the neighbouring Holland, and well above that of
the industrial giants Japan, Germany and USA.
This high productivity is not limited to
industrial work. Although in overall GNP per
capita, Belgium only ranks within the 10 or so
richest countries, in GNP produced per hour
worked, it is first. This productivity is due to
a generally high level of education resulting in
highly skilled labor, extended automatization,
shift work that minimizes idle time, and low
absenteeism. Although employees have relatively
much vacation and free time, and can easily take
time off for illness without risking to lose
their jobs, few working days are actually lost.
This is also due to the excellent system of low
cost medicine and the tradition of solving
industrial conflicts by negotiations. Somewhat
surprisingly, given the well publicized strikes,
industrial unrest over the last 15 years in
Belgium is one of the lowest in the European
Union.
Thanks to the open market, the good
distribution channels and the strong consumer
requirements, one can find the most diverse and
high quality goods in the shops at relatively
low prices. The high production and consumption
standards have led to the publicity slogan "This
is Belgian" being used as a quality label (and
not, as one might imagine, as an appeal to
nationalistic feelings, such as "Buy American").
The association of "Belgian" with "high quality"
is slowly diffusing to neighbouring countries,
especially in the domains of food, drink and
housing. More unexpectedly, Belgians (such as
the "Antwerp Six" group) have made inroads in
top ten fashion design, a domain which was
almost exclusively under the control of French,
Italian and Japanese designers.
Although a few spectacular murders and
robberies have grabbed the public attention and
crime rates have been increasing, the crime rate
in Belgium is still quite low. The British
ministery of Foreign Affairs calculated that
Brussels is the safest capital in the world with
respect to the risk for murder. With a ratio of
0.4% per 100,000 inhabitants (4 murders per
million) Brussels is situated in front of Rome
(1.7) and London (2.1), and far before Moscow
(18.1) and Washington (69.3). A 1990
UN
crime survey found that Belgian cities
scored among the best for risks of assault and
frightening threats.
All this, together with the generally
peaceful atmosphere, and the effort put into
developing the basic things in life (Belgium is
one of the few countries where there is no
housing problem, because almost every Belgian
family tends to build its own home) would put
Belgium very high on a "quality
of life" ordering of countries. In
international polls, Belgians always tend to
come out among those most satisfied with their
life and least inclined to emigrate to another
country. This is in sharp contrast, but not in
contradiction, with the very critical attitude
which Belgians exhibit towards their country and
government. (one can only conclude that they
would be even more critical when living in
another country).
The things that are especially noticed by
foreign visitors are the excellent food, and the
very dense concentration of restaurants and
pubs, everywhere in the country. Not just the
quantity but the quality of restaurants is
exceptional: Belgium is the country with the
highest number of Michelin stars (the most
acclaimed gastronomical distinction for a
restaurant) per head of the population. Given
this overwhelming competition, it is not
surprising that Belgium is the only country in
the world where the fast-food giant McDonald's
has been consistently losing money.
Belgian
cuisine, which is related to the French one,
but with some very distinctive touches, offers
many dishes worth trying. A well-known
speciality are the Belgian chocolates which are
sold all over the world. And then there is the
national dish, "French"
Fries ("frites"), which, according to
legend, were invented in Belgium, not France,
and which are supposed to be better here than in
any other place in world.
Especially the beer (see
Belgium:
beer paradise) is a national speciality:
there are hundreds of different types with
distinctive tastes, which are all served in
their own specially made glasses. Beer, for
Belgians, is about as important as wine is for
the French. It is a pity that the international
marketing is not better developed, because
everybody drinks Dutch, Danish or German beers,
whereas the Belgian ones (which are much richer
in variety and taste) are known only by the real
beer lovers. Recently, though, Belgian
speciality beers are getting more and more
popular, not only in the neighbouring France,
Holland and UK, but even in the USA.
Problems, Problems...
In order to relativize this quite rosy picture
of Belgium, let me also mention the most serious
problems that are to be solved. The budget
deficit has, after many economies, finally
gotten under control. However, it has led to a
government debt, which, as a percentage of GNP,
is the highest one in the industrialized world
(OECD countries). The Belgian state as a whole
has no external debt, though (in contrast to for
example the U.S.A). This can be explained by the
fact that Belgium has one of the highest savings
percentages in the world. The debts of the
government are more than compensated for by the
credits accumulated by Belgian companies and
households, which are eager to invest their
money in government bonds, as they offer a high
and reliable interest. The balance of payments
for Belgium has been consistently positive over
the last decades. This may in part explain the
ease with which the government has been relying
on borrowed money.
Another problem that is often mentioned is
the high percentage of unemployment. However, if
unemployment is calculated according to
international norms (where people are polled
whether they are actually looking for a job,
instead of counting how many people are entitled
to benefits), the unemployment rate is almost
half of the official one, and comparable to the
presently low US rate. In particular Flanders
experiences at present a sharp decrease in
unemployment. Given the demographic evolution,
it seems likely that there will soon be a
problem of lack of people to fill the job
openings, rather than one of unemployment. The
well-publicised factory closings (such as the
closing of the Renault car factory in Vilvoorde,
which reached the international headlines) do
not contradict this trend. They are merely the
side effect of the on-going transition to an
information society, where low-skilled
industrial jobs are gradually replaced by
high-skilled jobs in the service sector. Two
years after the Renault closing, which came as a
shock to many people, practically all former
employees had found a new job.
Another recurrent problem is the integration
of the many Islamic immigrants (mostly Morrocans
and Turks). It is often difficult for these
people, many of whom are lowly skilled and have
poor knowledge of the language and culture, to
find good jobs. This has led to a few riots in
quarters with predominantly immigrant
populations, and to problems of drug use and
petty crime among unemployed young men. This,
more frighteningly, has reinforced the
popularity of extreme right parties with an
anti-immigrant agenda (although it seems that
their share of the vote has presently peaked).
Although economic immigration has basically been
halted, Belgium, like other European countries,
experiences a problem of growing numbers of
Third World and Eastern Eureopean people that
are either demanding asylum or entering the
country illegally. This puts the authorities in
a difficult situation, where they have to choose
between forcefully repatriating people to go
back to a miserable life or risking a rising
flow of poor immigrants.
The most talked about problem of the last few
years is the urgently needed reorganization of
the police and justice system. A number of high
profile cases with police bungling have made it
clear that the traditional systems were not
prepared to the fast paced world of the end of
the twentieth century. Parliament has recently
passed some laws which propose far reaching
changes, especially for the police. However,
according to insiders, the biggest problems
reside not in the police, which had already been
quietly modernizing over the last few years, but
in the courts and justice system, which still
use 19th century tools and methods to tackle
21st century problems. It is to be hoped that
the reforms of justice will be profound enough
to eradicate this problem.
The Belgian way of problem-solving
In cybernetical terms, the Belgian system might
be described as highly self-organizing. The
political system is based on discussion and
compromise between different groups of interest,
without a clear central control (the
king
has no real power, and the prime minister is
mainly the person who is best suited for
implementing the agreements). For example,
socio-economical problems are mostly avoided by
preparing "collective labor agreements", where
trade unions and employers reach a compromise on
wage increases in the coming period. Only when
unions and employers cannot reach consensus, the
governement will intervene by proposing a
compromise.
A special expression, "a Belgian compromise",
has been invented to design the typical
solutions derived in this way: complex issues
are settled by conceding something to every
party concerned, through an agreement that is
usually so complicated that nobody completely
understands all its implications. In spite of
the apparent inefficiency of these settlements,
the compromises do work in practice, because
they stop the existing conflicts, and thus allow
life to go on without fights or obstructions.
The practical ambiguities and confusions that
arise out of the compromise are usually solved
on the spot by the Belgians' talent for
improvisation.
The experience gained in negotiating these
intricate multiparty, multilingual and
multicultural problems has led to an unlikely
new export product: Belgian political expertise.
At a certain moment, the presidents of the four
largest political groups in the European
Parliament, socialists, christian democrats,
liberals and rainbow, were all Belgian, as was
the president of the European federation of
trade unions. The Belgian prime minister,
Jean-Luc
Dehaene, demonstrated the expertise he
gathered in this kind of problem-solving when he
succeeded in untying the Gordian knot of
assigning some dozen different European
institutions to the different member states of
the European Union (a problem which had eluded
the previous British and Danish presidencies of
the European Community) by on the spot creating
a new institution, so that every country could
carry something home. This made him the
front-runner in the race for becoming the new
president of the European Commission (the "head
of government" on the European level). The only
reason he did not get the post was because of a
veto by the British Conservatives, who
apparently were afraid that he might be too
successful in the on-going drive to European
integration.
Another example of this peculiar way of
problem-solving, which reached the international
newspapers, was the royal question. All laws
accepted by Belgian parliament must be signed by
the king before they can be applied. Normally
this is an automatic procedure, but in the case
of the law legalizing abortion, the former king
Baudoin, on religious grounds, concluded that
his conscience did not allow him to approve the
law. The government discovered a small paragraph
in the constitution stating that approval of the
king is not needed in situations where the king
is incapable to govern, a provision for
exceptional circumstances such as mental illness
of the ruler. The compromise reached between
government and king, was that the king was
declared incapable to rule for just one day,
enough to pass the law without his signature!
Though people who highly respect formal rules
might be shocked by such a pragmatic treatment
of a sensitive issue, the problem was solved in
a for everybody acceptable way: the king's
conscience was kept intact, and the democratic
decision was implemented with a minimum of
delay. A change of the constitution is planned
in order to avoid similar problems in the
future.
Art: between the real and the surreal
Like the other domains of culture and society,
Belgian art moves between the two poles of
practical materialism and open-minded
rebelliousness. The corresponding artistic
styles that are most typically Belgian are
realism or naturalism, which tries to depict
life as it is in all its vivid, down-to-earth
details, and surrealism or symbolism, which
explores other worlds, where the normal rules do
not apply. What both poles have in common is
their rejection of formalism or ideology, and a
desire to question accepted wisdom, often in a
humorous way. Belgians instinctively distrust
any system that tells them how they should
think, behave or produce art. They are also not
fond of sentimentality or Romantic idealization,
where the concrete details that make life so
complex are ignored in order to promote heroism
or gracefulness. The lack of sympathy for
abstract systems may explain why Belgians have
made relatively little contributions to music,
the most formal of all arts, and have instead
focused on the
visual
arts and literature, which allow you to
directly depict (sur)reality.
These characteristics already come to the
fore in the 15th century, when the "Flemish
primitives" revolutionized painting. In contrast
to the Italian school, whose paintings are
characterized by an idealized elegance, Flemish
masters such as
Van
Eyck surprise by their extremely elaborate,
life-like pictures, such as the
Arnolfini
wedding,where every detail is where it
should be, including the curls of hair of the
little dog and the reflection of the painter in
the mirror that hangs behind the couple being
portrayed. Still, the medieval landscapes in the
background and the spiritual, symbolic intent of
many paintings give them a dreamy, almost
mythical character.
This first generation sets the tone for the
artists that follow. Some towering figures of
the following generation are
Bruegel,
whose well-known images of dancing and
eating
farmers illustrate the Belgian's
down-to-earth enjoyment of life, and
Bosch,
whose apocalyptic but humorous pictures
exemplify surrealism and its questioning of
everything, including the laws of nature
themselves. The fact that these two poles of the
down-to-earth and the surreal are not that far
apart is shown by
some
paintings of Bruegel that were obviously
inspired by Bosch's nightmarish visions. The
17th century is dominated by
Rubens,
who added sensuality to the range of pleasures
of the flesh that had been depicted in painting.
The
Romantic 19th century in Belgium is dominated by
symbolism or idealism, genres that try to
transcend everyday reality. Some typical
exponents are
Fernand
Knopff, whose work is exemplified by a
painting of an elegant, languorous panther with
the head of a woman, and
Félicien
Rops, with his satanic-erotic illustrations.
On the opposite side of this more decadent,
surreal strand are naturalists, such as
Constantin
Meunier, who criticize society by depicting
the grim reality of working class life. The real
and the surreal meet in the work of
James
Ensor, with his sensual depictions of
every-day objects and sinister caricatures of
bourgeois society, the "School of Latem", with
their ethereal landscapes, and
Permeke,
with his powerful, expressionist pictures of
farmers and laborers.
Surrealism proper starts in the 1920's. Its
most famous Belgian exponents are René
Magritte,
who is perhaps the most reproduced artist of the
20th century, and
Paul
Delvaux. Magritte's creative genius is
revealed by his impossible, but haunting
combinations of ordinary, very realistically
depicted phenomena, such as a locomotive
steaming out of a chimney piece, or a castle
built on top of a rock that hovers above a
stormy sea. Delvaux's sense of beauty is
somewhat more traditional, with his dream-like
landscapes of Greek temples and old-fashioned
train stations, populated by skeletons,
statuesque women, investigative scientists, and
the little man-in-the-street with his bowlar hat
that is also a favorite character of Magritte.
Literature: the independent investigator
Representing and questioning everyday reality is
also the underlying theme in much of
Belgian
literature. We already find it in the Middle
Ages with the fable of the sly
fox
"Reynard", who poked fun at the
establishment represented by self-important but
not so smart figures like Nobel, the lion-king,
Bruyn the bear and Isengrim the wolf. In the
19th century, this theme is revived in a more
realistic setting by Charles De Coster, with his
both dramatic and comic novel about Thyl
Uylenspiegel, who rebelled against the Spanish
oppressors by mocking them, helped by his friend
Lamme Goedzak, a Bruegel-like character whose
highest pleasures consist in eating and
sleeping.
The symbolist movement finds its expression
in poets such as Emile Verhaeren and the Nobel
laureate Maurice Maeterlinck. Naturalism and its
criticism of society by the depiction of the
sometimes dramatic, sometimes endearing, life of
ordinary folk is represented by Flemish authors
such as Streuvels, Timmermans, Elsschot and
later Boon and
Claus.
Surrealism is a major inspiration for the poet
Henry
Michaux, and for the novelists Johan Daisne
and Hubert Lampo, who exemplify the typically
Belgian school of "magical realism". Like the
paintings of Delvaux and Magritte, their novels
start with the description of ordinary folks in
ordinary situations, which, however, are
gradually invaded by mystery, by weird
coincidences and impossible happenings that seem
to point to some parallel world or reality
beyond ordinary appearances.
What distinguishes these Belgian literary
styles from their counterparts in other
countries, such as Zola's naturalism, or the
"magical realism" of Kafka and the
Latin-American authors, such as Marquez, is
their absence of fatalism. Although reality may
be very hard to live with, and surreality
impossible to comprehend, the individuals in
Belgian novels can make a difference. They are
not mere toys of fate, or cogs in a machine they
cannot control. Although they will never be able
to grasp everything, they do manage to reach
better understanding through exploration and
observation.
Similar themes run through the more popular
literature, and even through
comic
strips, the merging of literary and visual
art at which Belgians excel.
Georges
Simenon, with his famous character,
inspector Maigret, represents the naturalistic
pole. Both his detective and his more literary
novels enthrall by their accurate, though
sympathetic observation of people and
captivating rendering of the atmosphere, rather
than by a sophisticated plot. On the fantastic
end of the scale, authors like Thomas Owen and
especially
Jean
Ray (aka John Flanders) turn their detective
stories into gothic novels, where the
investigation of a mystery uncovers untold
horrors.
The detective, researcher or reporter who
investigates a mysterious situation is perhaps
the prototypical hero in Belgian story-telling.
That hero has neither superhuman powers nor
passionate Romantic ideals. It is rather an
ordinary person, perhaps even a child (like in
most comic strips), who is just a little smarter
and more curious than the others, and therefore
manages to find out things that remain hidden
for those that don't look beyond appearances. In
comic
strips, some of the more well-known heroes
of this kind are the world famous
Tintin,
Blake and Mortimer, Suske and Wiske, and Spirou.
It is perhaps also not a coincidence that the
British writer Agatha Christie's most famous
character, the detective Hercule Poirot, is
supposed to be Belgian.